Sat, Nov 21, 2009
|
Negotiating and Sales Skills Are Critical
| | Friday, April 25, 2003 @ 05:00 AM EDT
| Printer Friendly Page
Send this Story to a Friend | Contributed by: Tim Randle
Tim Randle Properties
Read more archived articles about Buying
When
I first started getting active in creative real estate,
my skill set at negotiating was very weak. I had done the
telemarketing thing for American Express as a financial
planner and had studied and learned a few techniques.
On
the surface one might think that would be a perfect
tie-in to talking to sellers about their properties and their
financial situation. I can promise you it wasn't.
Yes,
I did pick up asking general sales techniques like never
asking close-ended ("yes" or "no" answers) questions.
Also,
it still works to ask multiple choice assumptive questions
like "Would Tuesday at 6 p.m. or Thursday at 3 p.m. work
better for you?". The basics were not enough.
When
I first began asking sellers what their loan balance was,
I may have actually received a number for an answer 50% of
the time. I had two major obstacles facing me.
First,
my belief system was glass-eyed in that having come
from a financial/accountant type background, I knew without a
shadow of a doubt that no one would ever just give me their
house and that only a complete fool would tell me the balance
remaining on their loan.
Second,
I didn't have a clue as to the right way to ask and I can
tell you from experience
that it matters greatly.
The
first obstacle, belief system, was easily overcome after I
met my first truly motivated seller. Okay, beliefs systems are
trashed and I must be the complete fool because that was
way too easy.
The
second obstacle, phraseology/negotiating, is no longer
an obstacle, per se, but it is still a skill that I continually try
to
improve upon. The two key components, assuming you have
already properly established good rapport, are timing and the
phrases you use.
Here
are some quick examples of how NOT to ask a seller what
the loan balance is:
- What do you
owe?
- Are you willing
to sell it for what you owe?
- How much equity
would you say you have?
- etc., etc.
Now,
don't get me wrong. If you use these phrases and similar
ones enough times and with enough confidence, you will be
able to get a numerical answer on occasion (as opposed to
some of the not so friendly responses I received early on).
Contrast
the above phrases to these:
- How much is
left on the loan?
- So, the property's
not owned free and clear?
- etc., etc.
The
first set of questions personalizes the issue and attaches
the debt, and thus the problem, with the seller. The second
set of questions creates detachment and since it's no longer
"their debt" or "their problem" or "what they
owe", it's just simply
a number and not a problem to share.
Since
I first picked up on this one little tactic, I would estimate
I get all the information I want on 99 out of 100 calls with almost
no real effort. Granted,
it does take time and practice to develop
decent phone skills. The ability to naturally create rapport and
flow with the call, yet still get the information you want will come
with time. My point is that it's important to begin testing and
tracking different approaches. If you do this, you will notice some
very interesting results.
Here's
another example when asking about whether or not the
seller would consider a carryback (financing it for you). I'd
suggest actually trying this one out just to verify the reality. If
I
ask a seller something like:
- Would you consider
owner finance?
- Would you do
a carryback?
- Would you carry
paper on this?
- etc., etc.
what
do you think my responses will be? Yes, I know that we
like to use our fancy terminology once we've mastered it. I'm
probably as guilty as anyone in that regard. However, what
the above questions accomplish is forcing the seller into a
corner. Either they have to admit they don't understand, and
thus appear foolish, or simply say "no". Which do you think
happens most often?
Compare
the above questions with something like:
- Are you in
a position where you could take payments?
- Would it be
possible for me to make payments for a while
and pay off your loan later?
These
questions almost always lead to a "yes" or a "tell me
more" type response. You'll be amazed at the difference.
These
are just two quick examples of how the phrases you
choose can affect your results. Take a minute to consider
how many questions you ask and how much information you
attempt to extract from a seller in a single call. Knowing what
to say and when to say it will improve your performance more
than you can imagine.
Sincerely,
Tim Randle
Word Cloud: "their loan financial promise choice left timing surface trashed techniques. forcing position single tactic, doubt might little could house while estate, ones calls naturally call, general (financing only it's carry early matters phrases glass-eyed better second, quick belief into creates thing equity now, beliefs truly carryback questions always sales examples affect time. which "tell obstacles skills. was, work loan? don't regard. experience were easily remaining above admit enough have? more probably response. knowing create motivated decent already friendly techniques system you?". major system, "what than debt" occasion phraseology/negotiating, upon. will started knew consider after begin studied granted, many corner. learned thus here clue picked able payments lead carryback? give mastered paper almost what about foolish, negotiating practice simply tie-in sellers like: where possible payments? suggest weak. planner rapport situation. american whether just information very owe", actually develop yes, does want good seller clear? come wrong. notice amazed owe? something would properties anyone first, these difference. appear components, most some financial/accountant questions. wasn't. understand, once perfect this, real often? more" owned share. example continually know sell "yes" choose point rapport, free okay, approaches. minute asking make reality. answer assumptive properly second this skills creative trying you'll fancy have balance longer guilty since estimate didn't willing skill thursday tracking use. extract later? loan. important never enough. on). responses opposed times overcome either however, much contrast personalizes confidence, we've assuming complete interesting type ever this? here's multiple happens background, shadow issue ("yes" obstacle, basics "no". etc., tell improve telemarketing began express talking effort. finance? problem another testing p.m. received systems works getting call. answers) "no" they time ability compare also, verify established when flow different these: etc. pick easy. terminology seller. sincerely, attempt owner randle similar debt, because active performance having first you). imagine. right fool done attaches accomplish "would still think problem" greatly. facing take tuesday detachment phone without problem, with close-ended results. number property's numerical must like critical
|
|
| |
Average Score: 4.11 Votes: 17

|
|
|
|
|
Logged In members can moderate all comments.
|
|