You have three properties. Each property had debt. You refinanced that debt. The amount of the debt you refinanced for each individual property, is still acquisition debt for that property.
The portion of your mortgage interest that applies to that property's original loan amount is still expensed on the Schedule E for that property.
Let's say you have three rental properties -- A, B, and C -- with loan amounts of $27K, $33K, and $40K. You decide to refinance all these loans into one $100K blanket mortgage with all three properties as collateral for the loan. At the end of the year, you get a 1098 saying that you paid $6000 in mortgage interest during the year.
You allocate the mortgage interest to each property in proportion to the amount of the loan that was refinanced for each property. 27% of your new loan refinanced Property A, 33% of your new loan refinanced property B, and 40% of your new loan refinanced property C.
Your mortgage interest deduction on the Schedule E for property A will be 27% of $6000, or $1620. The Schedule E deduction for property B will be $1980. The Schedule E deduction for property C will be $2400.
This does not apply in your case, but I am also saying that the mortgage interest is deducted against the asset the loan proceeds purchased, not necessarily against the asset that secures the loan.
For example, you use the equity in your primary residence to take out an equity loan for $75K which you then use to purchase a rental property. You gave a mortgage on your primary residence to secure the equity loan. The rental property is owned free and clear.
Now, at the end of the year, you get a mortgage interest statement from your lender for the home equity loan. The mortgage interest deduction for your equity loan is taken on the Schedule E for the property you bought, and NOT taken as a home mortgage interest deduction on Schedule A.
Does this clear it up?
Since all the Schedule E entries are all added up together and reported as a single income or loss entry on page 1 of your 1040, it would not seem to make any difference in your tax bill if all three properties are lumped together in a single entry on your Schedule E.
In practice, however, you have three rental activities with separate income, separate expenses, and separate depreciation schedules. The IRS wants you to account for all the rental income and expenses for each activity.
If you have suspended passive losses, the IRS wants you to separately track the amount of suspended loss for each property, too.
When you sell just one of the properties, you will need to calcuate your adjusted cost basis for that property and the amount of unrecaptured depreciation for that property, which will be a lot easier to defend to the IRS auditor if you maintain a separate Schedule E entry for each property.
It is a lot easier to maintain continuity with your prior year's tax returns too. Changing your tax reporting to lump everything together into a single Schedule E may raise an audit flag. The IRS will want to know what happened to the three properties you had last year that you are not reporting this year and not reporting a sale.
You have three separate rental activities, so report them in three separate columns on your Schedule E..
[ Edited by NewKidInTown3 on Date 12/06/2008 ]