Quote:
|
On 2007-10-30 03:46, TracyH wrote:
I just don't get the 45 day thing. I can understand why the IRS wanted to set the 180 day limit, but why wouldn't that deadline be sufficient? (Rhetorical question. I'll stop beating this horse). |
|
When Mr. Starker did the very first delayed exchange, there were no specific rules in place. He was attempting to complete a direct or simultaneous exchange except Crown Zellerbach Corporation (the other party to the exchange) did not have any suitable property to exchange that Mr. Starker wanted.
Mr. Starker and Crown Zellerbach took the exchange one step further. Mr. Starker agreed to transfer title to his property immediately and further agreed that Crown Zellerbach would have the next five years to acquire property acceptable to Mr. Starker that would be used to complete the exchange.
Meanwhile, the money that Crown Zellerbach would pay for Mr. Starker's property would be held in escrow in an interest bearing account.
This was the first delayed exchange, and there were no rules governing the timeline. In effect, Mr. Starker had a five year identification period. Eventually, Mr. Starker identified nine different land parcels that Crown could acquire to complete its side of the exchange.
In 1984, after this delayed exchange survived a three separate challenges in court and the tax deferral was upheld, Congress passed rules to put constraints on the delayed exchange. It was not until 1991 -- a full seven years later -- that the IRS finalized its interpretative regulations. These regulations have governed delayed exchange transactions since June 10, 1991.
I don't know what the sense of Congress was at the time, but I am sure they felt that a five year identification period was much too long.
[ Edited by NewKidInTown3 on Date 10/30/2007 ]