The #1
Real Estate Investing
Community

Tue, Feb 09, 2010 
Topics 'N Comments
Forum Topics
* Hot Check/Tenant Now In Nursing Home
* Tax Deeds
* Question On House Being Built
* How To Garnish And Evicted Tenant's Wages?
* I Need Some Direction, Time Is Running Out For Me.
* Partnering With Lender
* Claiming Mortgage Interest On A SUB2
* *** Buying At The Courthouse Steps ***
* *** Hight Interest On 2nd *** What To Do?
* Since It's Income Tax Season

Comments
* Thanks for sharing...
* Thanks for posting...
* If buying a...
* Can anyone tell me...
* The problem is, Lou...
* I am new to this...
* When I was a small...
* Done properly with a...
* I don''t get that...
* That''s good advice,...
Contact Us
703-778-5755
Login Problems?
Sales
Support
Feedback
Recommend Us
History and Purpose of TCI


Advertise on our site
Advertising Login
Sell Your Product Here!
Official PayPal Seal
Send this to:                            

'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner

Wednesday, October 02, 2002 @ 05:00 AM EDT Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page
Send this Story to a Friend  Send this Story to a Friend


Contributed by: John Locke

John Locke Properties

Read more archived articles about Buying

Where the term ‘Subject To’ came from is a mystery to me. Whoever thought of this method of investing should be immortalized in the real estate investing Hall of Fame, should there ever be one.

When you purchase a property ‘Subject To’ the existing loan stays in your seller’s name. In other words, the seller
 
Advertisement
leaves his current loan on his property in place and makes it available for you and then your buyers’ use. You become the owner of the property when the seller signs the Grant Bargain & Sale Deed or other State specific device to transfer property.

You usually give the seller of the property at least token money, what I refer to as ‘U-Haul’ money or moving out money for their equity. When you sell the property, you can offer No Qualifying Loans to your buyers. This makes the house attractive in your prospective buyer’s eyes. Selling ‘No Qualifying’ to someone does not necessarily mean your buyer has bad credit. It could mean he/she is new to the area and some lenders want two years residency before granting a loan. Because you are selling to Non Qualifying buyers you should get $6K to $12K down on houses worth $100K to $150K. Remember you are the owner so you can even advertise Owner Financing. You can raise the interest rate; let’s say it is 7%, make it 9% this will add an additional $200 per month in your pocket. Then you might increase the value of the house 10% to 20% so when the time comes for your buyer to refinance, usually in approximately 2 years, this could give you an additional $10K, $20K, $30K etc. once the house is actually refinanced. The average profit on one deal of this kind would be close to $28K for your investment of around $1K.

Before 1988, 1989 there were loans, FHA – VA, that were fully assumable with out qualifying; no credit check required. Today almost all loans include a Due on Sale (DOS) clause whereby the lender can call the note due and payable upon transfer of the property to someone else.

However, it is my belief that if the loan is kept current then no ‘flag’ is thrown to trigger this clause. I have personally never had a loan called on my properties nor known anyone else that has. It is not illegal to take over or, I should say, become responsible for someone else’s loan. I felt this area of ‘Subject To’ should be covered, as it is a risk inherent with ‘Subject To’ investing, but certainly one that has not concerned me. However, you should be prepared to address this situation should the need arise by re-financing or building your Trust Account up, which I will discuss below. There are risks in all forms of real estate investing if not done properly. ‘Subject To’ is no different.

I use a Loan Servicing Company (LSC) to collect my buyers’ payments and to disperse these funds to the lenders. This is also an excellent way to address the objection from a seller, “how do I know my payments will be made, so my credit is not affected.” Set up a trust account at the LSC where you leave extra money to make payments should your buyer or buyers fail to do so; usually one to three months of mortgage payments taken out of what you get as a down payment on the property. The LSC sends out year-end statements to your buyers that they use for interest deductions on their income tax. The LSC eliminates your having to take care of accounting and mailings that take away from your productive time of buying and selling houses. The LSC also keeps a record of how your buyer is timely paying the mortgage, this plays an important role when the time comes for him to refinance. Lenders rely heavily upon this record in making a decision to loan money. I stress to my buyers how important it is to make their payment on time. Even buyers that have had credit problems in the past have been able to get a new loan because they have made their payments on time to the LSC.

When you first start doing ‘Subject To’ investing, you will be ‘Subject To’ receiving large amounts of money. If you are not accustomed to this type of money being available to you, then my advice would be, instead of buying the new Mercedes, let your Trust Account build up to a comfortable level then budget your money on a monthly basis. Then buy the Mercedes or 'Beamer' for the younger set.

You may possess all the knowledge in the world about real estate investing, which is absolutely useless unless you ‘apply’ the knowledge learned.

This is a small effort on my part to give you a better understanding of ‘Subject To’ investing.

John $Cash$ Locke



Note:

John '$Cash$' Locke has purchased and sold over 500 properties since 1995, part time, which is verifiable through various County Recorders Offices. You can learn about John's great system, in his new course about 'subject to' properties. Click here. For more info or to register for the class, click here http://www.thecreativeinvestor.com/Product138.html


Word Cloud:
account investing, interest would buying record loan even /> when address makes investing lenders give 'subject money. which this comes make qualifying down when were someone could money property. credit take current buyers’ should because property transfer real /> you what loan. loans beginner become buyer will where time seller mean with payment important then upon trust area ‘subject there have owner estate buyers house other additional knowledge they selling available also payments sale usually

 
Username or Email

Password

Remember Me:

Join 243,628 other
members FREE!
· More about Buying
· Other articles by John

John Products:
Big Bucks Bird-Dogging
Big Bucks Bird-Dogging


Most read story about Buying:
Carleton Sheets Real Estate Investing

Average Score: 4.40
Votes: 52


Please take a second and vote for this article:

Bad
Regular
Good
Very Good
Excellent



Printer Friendly Page  Printer Friendly Page

Send this Story to a Friend  Send this Story to a Friend

Threshold
Logged In members can moderate all comments.
Re: 'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner (Score: 1)
by joel on Saturday, October 12, 2002 @ 04:57 PM EDT

How does one find a LSC? And what qualities are there in a good LSC?[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]




Re: 'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner (Score: 1)
by beacon on Monday, November 18, 2002 @ 12:41 PM EST

J,

Is the due on Sale clause something to worry about before getting into this line of investing?

It seems like the investor can get stuck paying alot of money before he/she sees any returns.

Where can I find more info on subject to's?[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]



  • Re: 'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner by JohnLocke on Monday, November 18, 2002 @ 01:12 PM EST



  • Re: 'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner (Score: 1)
    by lsngo on Tuesday, November 19, 2002 @ 08:31 PM EST

    i'm browsing under someone else's login but had to respond to what john$locke had to say. am i the only one that has trouble digesting what he had to say? why would the seller of a home leave a home if title has not been transferred? and how would this "system" work if the seller refuses to leave?

    let's say you can work this issue out, but others remain. why would anyone selling his/her home be willing to sell the house "subject to"? the homeowner bears the entire risk in the scenario that locke described and that makes no sense. most sellers want to walk away from the sale without having to worry about the home anymore, but locke's system seems to assume the converse.

    assuming that a homeowner is willing to settle for something less than a complete sale, it seems logical that this situation would only arise if the homeowner is receiving something of value (put yourself in the homeowner's shoes, would you accept a few bucks for the right that you're giving up?). but if the buyer (i.e., you) is giving up something of value, then the system seems to break down. how are you supposed to afford the option? and with no transfer of title, what do you have to protect you from simply losing the cash?

    a contract is probably the answer. but in order for a contract to be enforceable, it's generally the rule that its terms have to be definite. one of those terms is the contract period. if you only have a limited period of time to find another buyer before the option period expires, then you bear the entire risk of the transaction (i.e., you could have paid good money for a limited option and still not have found a buyer for the right price within the specified time).

    sounds like a sure fire way to lose money. am i missing something? you out there master john$cash$locke$$$?

    call me lc[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]



  • Re: 'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner by JohnLocke on Tuesday, November 19, 2002 @ 09:38 PM EST


  • Re: 'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner by Lufos on Saturday, June 12, 2004 @ 12:09 AM EDT



  • Re: 'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner (Score: 1)
    by lsngo on Tuesday, November 19, 2002 @ 10:54 PM EST

    lc here again (and the owner of this login is getting pissed so it may be my last post unless you guys demand a response). pardon the delay. just got back from dinner.

    the cashman's reply, unfortunately, is unresponsive. sure, he does not use the same terms, but that's a distinction without a difference. the form of the question is irrelevant, the issues remain.

    what amount of U-Haul money would be a sufficient incentive for a homeowner to move out of his/her house? (to answer that question, i'd encourage the reader to put himself/herself in the homeowner's shoes for a minute) and if title to the house will continue to remain in the homeowner's (as opposed to your) name, what are you really getting in exchange for the U-Haul money? some might say you're entitled to a legal right at that point. but without a written contract embodying that right (which is commonly referred to as an "options contract" or an "option" for short), you have nothing (go consult a lawyer on this point).

    now, if you do get a written contract properly reflecting your right, consider what that right might be. it is nothing more than an equitable title (not legal title) to the property, which gives you a (hopefully exclusive) right to close the deal on pre-specified terms. this means in order to turn a profit, you must sell the property/house at a better price than the pre-specified terms that you've negotiated. now can any of you imagine a homeowner that'd be willing to give you these exclusive rights unbounded by time? if you do, i have a nice little bridge in georgia for sale...

    if not, then you'd have to turn the property around within the limited options period in order for the system to work...note that the homeowner is not in the business of giving money away, so the pre-specified deal that you negotiated would probably not be too outrageously favorable.

    in case it's not abundantly clear by now. i'm pretty direct with my opinions. but i also do not mind others being direct with me. if there's a defect in my analysis, everyone (including master locke the cashman) feel free to point it out. but dwelling on terms like "options" and "limited periods" do not enhance credibility.[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]



  • So how do you buy property?? by joel on Tuesday, November 19, 2002 @ 11:07 PM EST


  • Re: 'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner by JohnLocke on Tuesday, November 19, 2002 @ 11:38 PM EST



  • Re: 'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner (Score: 1)
    by fearnsa on Monday, May 10, 2004 @ 01:51 AM EDT

    John,

    In your opinion what makes Lease Options a bad real estate road?

    Alan[ No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register ]



  • Re: 'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner by JohnLocke on Monday, May 10, 2004 @ 11:40 AM EDT


  • Re: 'Subject To' Investing for the Beginner by krissimazon on Wednesday, May 12, 2004 @ 07:29 PM EDT



  • Real Estate News | Real Estate Investing Articles | Real Estate Investing Gurus | Real Estate Forums | Real Estate Lenders | Real Estate Investing Groups | Real Estate Course Reviews | Real Estate Services | Real Estate Courses | Investment Properties | Real Estate Search | Commercial Properties | Land For Sale | Houses For Sale | Houses For Rent | Real Estate Comps | Sell House Quick | Sell House Fast

    The Creative Investor web site was created for Landlords, Property Managers and Real Estate Investing community.
    Through using our forums, investors will be able to talk about finance, no down payment purchases, debt payoff, purchase strategies and current real estate news.
    Privacy Agreement and Terms of Use. All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner.
    The comments are property of their posters, all the rest 2002 by PropBot.com L.L.C.